As you can tell, I have been enjoying shooting with my new camcorder doing video blogs and shooting shenanigans at our Mix 103.7 office. But I thought I’d go old-school today with 13 Thoughts.
1. Now that the Olympics are over, I don’t have to prentend to be excited when told Canada medalled in something other than hockey (I’ll save that rant for tomorrow). This might not be politically correct, but truthfully, I didn’t care if Canada won gold in combined cancer-curing. For me, nothing else mattered but gold in Men’s Hockey. Fait accompli.
2. For Christmas I got a 2010 Team Canada jersey. I decided I was going to put a name and number on it once the team was announced. Once I knew he was going to wear #16, I didn’t take long on deciding that I would go with Jonathan Toews, for no other reason than he was amazing in the shootout at the World Juniors a couple years ago against the U.S. and it would be a good conversation piece for when I go back to Chicago. Game-for-game he was our most consistent forward. Any line combination he was on (especially with Mike Richards and Brenden Morrow early in the tournament) made something happen on the ice. I am on board with Captain Serious. He brought us gold, delivered every game and justified my jersey selection.
3. As for our most consistent defenceman was also our youngest, Drew Doughty. I felt like he belonged on the team from the beginning but for him to be our most valuable D-man? And to think that some people thought Mike Green should’ve been on the team over Doughty. Which brings me to my next thought….
4. There should be no more second-guessing as to who should have been on the team and who shouldn’t have. The desired result was achieved. No, Brent Seabrook wasn’t as much of a shut-down guy as expected, Patrice Bergeron had some bad moments at the wrong times against Slovakia and Martin Brodeur almost single-handedly lost the first game against the U.S.A but every pick was justified. No more what-ifs or “so and so would’ve been better”. These players are champions. Which leads to…..
5. I’ve been vocal in my dislike for Sidney Crosby. I’ve never disagreed that he’s been a tremendous talent and that he’s a wunderkind and everything else. So with that, Crosby was my least favourite player on the team because I have never liked his act. From seeing him hot dog as a junior, to chewing out veteran Mark Recchi on the bench in his rookie year, to his chronic diving and whining to officials, I have never been a fan. I think his image is as contrived as Tiger Woods. I don’t buy the nice-guy, class-act, act. I feel like Don Cherry’s past criticisms of him were justified which jusified as he was the only one out-spoken (read: crazy) enough to vilify this hockey player, seeming beyond reproach. Obviously, I will be obeying my rule that that will be no haterade consumed at the expense of any of these players. They brought us something as a nation that gave us such joy and the components of this team shouldn’t be forgotten…..
6. And I know Sidney Crosby joins Paul Henderson and Mario Lemieux for scoring iconic goals for Canada (Toews, Jordan Eberle, Anson Carter and Joe Sakic would be in the secondary conversation) and deservedly so. However, not to take anything away from him and not to completely dismiss the goal as “right place, right time” let’s not forget two things: a) Jarome Iginla made a BRILLIANT pass back to Crosby on their beautiful give and go, which he’s not getting his due props for and b) as absolutely spectacular as Ryan Miller was for the Americans, there is extreme irony in allowing such a weak goal at such a crucial moment. I would go to war with Miller any time and after this tournament he can’t be denied consideration as one of the five best goalies in the game BUT he didn’t make a relatively easy save when he needed to. Just saying.

7. If anything, I’m happy this game didn’t go to a shootout. 1. I wouldn’t have been able to handle the intesity of the moment. 2. I think shootouts are a ridiculous way to resolve such an important game. Especially with IIHF rules which allow a player to continue to be sent out as a shooter in the sudden death round if nothing is solved after the first three shooters. I know this has worked to Canada’s benefit in the World Juniors with Toews aformentioned heroics but it’s a stupid rule and I would’ve felt guilty winning by sending Rick Nash out four times in a row and I would have been catatonic if we lost a game in that fashion.
8. There were no shortage of “Luuuuuuu” chants at “Vancouver Hockey Place” or at Longshots, where I watched most of the games. While he was just what Canada needed in relief for Brodeur and was tremendous in the clutch, especially against Slovakia, he looked a little shaky and allowed a soft goal in each game against the Slovaks and the USA. Unlike in ‘02 where Brodeur was one of the primary reasons Canada won, Luongo was good enough but not spectacular like Miller.
9. Mike Babcock coached his ass off. He pushed the right button every time. There were a couple times I thought he should’ve done something different. Against Germany he allowed Crosby to take a penalty shot over Rick Nash (not that it made a difference) and he allowed Bergeron on the ice against the Slovaks at crucial times where you could argue it might be too much to ask of him to be out there (results would back that up). But from the line combinations to the amount of time he played certain players, to matching up with other teams, Babcock was brilliant. If the NHLers are back in 2014, barring something ridiculous, Babcock will be back behind the bench for Canada.
10. Say the same for Steve Yzerman. He’d get all the blame if this team came up short of gold and isn’t getting the credit he deserves for building this squad. Stevie Y was my favourite player when he was active…now, like Gretz…he’s done it all.
11. While I’ve blasted him (most emphatic) and praised him (most recently) on this very blog, I can’t imagine how Brian Burke is handling everything emotionally. His son Brendan, who made headlines for announcing that he was now openly gay, died days before the beginning of the games. Then to endure one of the most, perhaps THE most, heartbreaking loss in U.S. hockey history, is more than most people can handle. This might be the only time I say this…but I genuinely feel for him. He looked devastated on the U.S. bench. He has nothing to be ashamed of. He built a strong USA team that gave Canada all it could handle, on two occasions in these games.
12. As much as we may loathe the U.S. winning any hockey tournament, I will say this…they must be respected for no other reason than they would never give up the way the Russians did against us. Some may argue that the U.S. development program is a rip-off of the Canadian system, but the Americans show Canadian-like heart. Whether they ripped that off too or not, at the very least, it should be respected.
13. It’s stupid and completely hypothetical but today I haven’t been to help but wonder if the 2010 gold medal team would beat the 2002 gold medal team. I know, I know, it’s like the whole “Could Dream Team I beat Dream Team II” USA Basketball debate, and I know it’s hard to compare because the ‘02 team was built for a larger ice surface but still…let’s explore this. Here’s the breakdown:
Goaltending-Edge: ’02 Team-Marty Brodeur relieved Curtis Joseph in a controversial decision after the first game against Sweden. Brodeur had more to do with the success of that gold medal team than the Brodeur/Luongo combination this year.
Defence-Edge: ‘02 Team-Both units were great but I’ll take the younger versions of Niedermayer and Pronger. Plus Foote, Blake and MacInnis before they got too old.
Forwards-Edge: ‘10-A difference in philosophy in selecting both teams but there was little drop off from the top line and the 4th line on the 2010 team. Plus, any line on the team could be a checking line or a scoring line depending on how you wanted to use them. You couldn’t say that as emphatically about the ‘02 team where the roles, on the whole, were more rigidly defined.
Coaching-Edge: ‘02-Come on, I’ll never give Pat Quinn the benefit of the doubt most of the time. He did a good job with the talented team he had. Babcock did a great job with the talented team he had.
Leadership-Edge: ‘02-Steve Yzerman and Joe Sakic were alternates to Mario Lemieux. Plus you throw in Blake, MacInnis, Foote, Ryan Smyth and Joe Nieuwendyk. In fairness, Niedermayer was a good captain this year and most of the guys on the team are too young to bear that type of responsibility yet. Although, Eric Staal, Crosby, Iginla, Richards, Toews and Shea Weber could all get consideration in 2014.
Depth-Edge: ‘10 team-It’s easier to remember who was left off the ‘10 team that could’ve made it. Although time may make the names that didn’t make the cut this time around less significant, we left behind Steven Stamkos, Jay Bouwmeester, Dion Phaneuf, Mike Green, Martin St. Louis, Vincent Lecavalier, Brad Richards and Jeff Carter.
Verdict-The ‘02 team. The right blend of youth, experience and unmatched goaltending. Again, this has a time bias but considering the current Hall of Famers on the ‘02 team (Lemieux, MacInnis and Yzerman) and players who will likely make the Hall of Fame that were on both teams (Pronger, Brodeur, Niedermayer, Iginla) there are some highly likely Hall of Fame candidates that are about to go in (Sakic, Blake and Brendan Shanahan) plus a couple that are on the fringe (Nieuwendyk and Eric Lindros).
There aren’t too many surefire Hall of Famers exclusive to the 2010 team that if you project their body of work, that are on pace to be recognized: Joe Thornton, Dany Heatley. It would be easy to say that Crosby or Staal or Doughty will be Hall of Famers but they’re still too early into their careers. Who thought that Simon Gagne and Eric Brewer were on the fast-track to the HOF after the ‘02 gold medal? Time will reveal all of this. But in the meantime, I’m taking the devil I know: The 2002 Gold Medal winners in Salt Lake City.